Fighting History
Rather dry but
still interesting exhibition at Tate Britain looking at history painting in
Britain both in its heyday of the 18th and 19th centuries when it was considered
the highest form of art and in contemporary art.
The exhibition's problem was that it was trying to cover too much! It might have worked better as two shows one looking at the genre at it's height and one looking at how we think of history in contemporary art.
Evening Standard
The show was
display by type of history as well as having a room on how it has been used in
a radical way and an overview of the history of the form. That room was
fascinating as it took you from Benjamin
West’s, though Millais’ hideously kitsch “Boyhood of Raleigh”, an Alma Tadema, a Sickert based on a photograph
produced within days of the event and ended with a Steve McQueen photograph of
a lynching tree.
The British
history room included the amazing “Amy Robsart”, a huge picture which was very
popular when it was first exhibited in 1877 but is now forgotten. It did make
me think about what is popular now and how they’ll be considered in the future.
I loved the
section on the documentary on the re-enactment of the Battle of Orgreave from
the miners’ strike. Many of the men involved at the time took part in the
re-enactment and it was used as an opportunity to record their recollections of
the event. It was shown as an installation with memorabilia from the event. It
really brought back the early 80s and made you think about how we record
history now.
The exhibition's problem was that it was trying to cover too much! It might have worked better as two shows one looking at the genre at it's height and one looking at how we think of history in contemporary art.
Reviews
GuardianEvening Standard
Comments