Rubens and his legacy: Van Dyck to Cezanne
Disappointing exhibition at the Royal Academy looking at how later artists have been inspired
by Rubens.
Guardian
Telegraph
Independent
I say
disappointing because a lot of the publicity has implied that this a big
Ruben’s show but they isn’t actually a huge amount of his work in the show.
It’s far more about his legacy which is really interesting but the narrative of
the show doesn’t flow very well.
After a couple of
rooms I worked out you needed to find the Rubens in the room then work out from
it to what came after. Often the Rubens is not the first thing you see in a
room and it takes some hunting and pushing against the flow. I also found some
of the room introduction boards were in odd places and didn’t lead you into the
narrative. For example in the first room you read the board and naturally turn
to your right where you find a Constable. Until you’ve looked at the Rubens you
are not sure why you are looking at a Constable!
There were some
fascinating works and things to learn. I loved the drawings for the Rubens
“Garden of Love” and was really interested to learn they had been owned by one
of Watteau’s patrons so you can see a direct link. I was also interested to see
what later artists had written about Rubens works such as Van Gogh’s comments
on one of the religious works.
The final room of
contemporary work curated by Jenny Saville was really refreshing on the eye
with some interesting comparisons however as ever in contemporary shows I am
going to say put the label by the picture don’t make me hunt for it! It’s a
long show I’m tired and grumpy by this stage!
Generally I felt
the narrative of the show would have worked better as a good lecture with
slides. Although it’s great to see the real pictures the nature of the rooms
and how they had to be hung broke up the narrative. I’d realised what I was
getting and have quite a good visual knowledge of Rubens so I worked it out but
listening to some of the people around me I’m not sure they knew what it was
about.
Reviews
TimesGuardian
Telegraph
Independent
Comments