The Vulgar: Fashion Redefined
Vibrant but
slightly confused exhibition at the Barbican looking at the concept of the
vulgar in fashion.
Reviews
Times
Guardian
Telegraph
I say confused as
I’m not sure it ever got to a good definition of what Vulgar is. The main
conclusion seemed to be that vulgar meant lower class often with the
implication of people trying to act and dress outside their class. This seemed
quite patronising and didn’t sit well with the designer clothes which made up
the majority of the show. I did like the fact that show was curated by both a
fashion curator and a psychoanalyst however that may have been what added to
the confusion. It did give you good ideas to go away and think about.
However the show
was visually stunning! I liked the fact the show included a lot of historical
ideas and them also looked at how those ideas are used by modern designers.
There was a lovely display in the middle which could be viewed from both levels
of 18th century clothing and modern designer versions. There were some great
outfits and I feel for a Vivienne Westwood bag designed like a bustle for Louis
Vuitton and a pale purple evening dress designed for Lady Clarke with the cross
keys of St Peter in pearls.
At times the show
also seemed to be looking at the history of fashion exhibitions in museums,
which in itself would be an interesting topic, but got a bit lost here. There
were also sections which didn’t actually seem to be vulgar! I think they may
have been there to point out the difference or does is say something about my
taste! I’d mention the section on classism and Greek style in clothing and a
wonderful display of white collars on black stands in a dark room. The latter
being one of the most beautiful displays I’ve seen this year.
Closes on 5
February 2017
Reviews
Times
Guardian
Telegraph
Comments