The Great War in portraits

Disappointing exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery of portraits from World War I.

I only say disappointing because this exhibition should have been so much bigger! What there was was well thought out and created some interesting dialogues between works but why give it only 4 small rooms. This is a national event and to me one of the most interesting aspects is the art it inspired and how it changed art. There is no way any curator could have done the subject full justice in four rooms. Why did the David Bailey get the whole of the rest of the floor? Yes I know economics as it’s a popular blockbuster and I guess it pays for this free show.

As I say what was there was fantastic. I liked the room of generals and ordinary solders with them taking opposing walls. I loved the fact they had some of the Tonks pictures of disfigured soldiers and that these were shown with some of the photos from the Sidcup hospital. I liked the idea of having a display of postcards and that they covered all countries and the sentimental as well as the straight portrait.

I am fond of William Orpen but thought he was over represented here. It felt like every third picture was by him and yet we didn’t get a Kennington, who is the best artist of the ordinary soldier, until the third room.

With such a small space I think I might have been more focused on portraits not just pictures of people. Much as I liked the dead stretcher bearer and the Nevinson of the machine gunners maybe they could have been replaced by more pictures of real rather than generic people. Also again I loved the idea of the wall of faces but space was in short supply it was a shame to fill so much of it with reproduced pictures.

Reviews
Guardian
Telegraph
Evening Standard


 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sky Arts Portrait Artist of the Year Exhibition 2019

Image
Delightful exhibition at Clarendon Fine Art showing pictures from the Sky Arts Portrait Artist of the Year TV series. I had loved the series which had set nine artists, both professional and amateur, to paint one of three celebrities. It then had a semi-final and final with them all looking at one sitter and in the final they also took on a commission. I loved the way you watched a picture build and how some were then made or spoiled by one stroke of paint.   Finding these pictures I knew so well in the flesh was therefore fascinating. None of them disappointed. My favourite artist from the final, Tom Mead, works looked just as good in real life if not better as you could see the detail. The show included his impressive self-portrait which he submitted to enter the competition, a wonderful fragmented picture of his reflection in a mirror giving a sense of movement. I loved that it included a large version of him and a miniature. His commission for the final of Jazzie B was
Read more

Thomas Becket: Murder and Making of a Saint

Image
Stunning exhibition at the British Museum on the life and afterlife of Thomas Becket. I studied Becket both at A Level and at university so I was really looking forward to this show and it did not disappoint. From walking in to see an old friend, the early Limoges casket showing the murder from the Victoria and Albert Museum, I was gripped. The show told the story well using fantastic objects and led you through his life, the murder, the political aftermath, his sainthood and miracles, and how Canterbury became a major pilgrimage site. It is hard to pick out the best objects as so many were wonderful. I loved that they had early copies of some of the five eyewitness accounts of the murder which made you fell you were almost touching the event. I liked the manuscript on his time in exile which was almost like a comic strip. How wonderful to get a 13th century font from Sweden which shows how far and how quickly the news that Henry II had integrated the murder spread. I think my
Read more

Courtauld summer school day 1

Image
Today has been my first day of this year’s week at the Courtauld Institute’s summer schools. This year I am doing “Painting in Renaissance Venice” which is being led by Michael Douglas-Scott. It was nice to see some familiar faces and there are at least five of us who did Michael’s course last year. Today has been two lectures. Firstly setting out the background of Venice in this period looking at how the city had set up a myth of itself, the role of the Doge. the nature of the Republic and the role of citizens. The second lecture looked at why the nature of Renaissance was different in Venice. There was still a sense of the coming of antiquity and humanism but in Venice it fused with the Gothic and Byzantine rather than replacing it. The day ended with a choice of gallery talks. I went to one on the second floor of the Courtauld on the coming of Modernism. In essence it looked at the Impressionists and discussed what they were reacting against and what themes they portrayed. All in a
Read more